On Tuesday, 1 August 2017 at 15:16:44 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Sorry, isn't that how things work now?
For modules, yes. For packages, no. That inconsistency is what I
want to change.
So since we have a package here and the compiler doesn't allow
you to define a package in the existing datetime.d, we have to
move the file. And unzipping doesn't pick up that the file was
moved and leaves old stuff behind.
b.d(1): Error: package name 'aa' conflicts with usage as a module
name in file
That error shouldn't exist.
The problem here is that the compiler picks up the OLD
datetime.d
If we could just use datetime.d as the package file, there would
be no old datetime.d anymore.
