On Wednesday, 13 September 2017 at 15:12:57 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 September 2017 at 11:03:38 UTC, Moritz
Maxeiner wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 September 2017 at 07:39:46 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
Hi Max,
[...]
Program Code:
[...]
foreach (string Fs; parallel(SizeDirlst[0 .. $], 1))
{
auto FFs = Fs.strip;
auto MSizeDirList = task(&coSizeDirList, FFs, SizeDir);
MSizeDirList.executeInNewThread();
auto MSizeDirListData = MSizeDirList.workForce;
MSresult.get ~= MSizeDirListData;
}
[...]
---
foreach (string Fs; parallel(SizeDirlst[0 .. $], 1))
{
MSresult.get ~= coSizeDirList(Fs.strip, SizeDir);
}
---
Hi Max,
It's Moritz, not Max. ;)
Below is the explanation of the above code.
[...]
AFAICT that's a reason why you want parallelization of
coSizeDirList, but not why you need to spawn another thread
inside of an *already parallelelized" task. Try my shortened
parallel foreach loop vs your longer one and monitor system load
(threads, memory, etc).
