On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 14:34:10 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/9/17 7:34 AM, Timoses wrote:
I suppose this is what Adam suggested, correct?
Yes, more or less. It's just an actual implementation vs. a
description in case it wasn't clear.
[...]
It's not much different from what Adam and I suggested. The
only thing you are missing is the ability to call the virtual
member without an instance. But if you name your functions
properly, and follow a convention, it will work for you.
-Steve
Greatly elaborated! Thank you, Steve!
I hope the vtable stuff is gonna be mentioned in the lectures I'm
currently watching : P.
