On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:55:23 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
I have recently started work on building a VM for Lua (actually a derivative of Lua) in X86-64 assembly. I am using the dynasm tool that is part of LuaJIT. I was wondering whether I could also write this in D's inline assembly perhaps, but there is one aspect that I am not sure how to do.

The assembly code uses static allocation of registers, but because of the differences in how registers are used in Win64 versus Unix X64 - different registers are assigned depending on the architecture. dynasm makes this easy to do using macros; e.g. below.

|.if X64WIN
|.define CARG1,         rcx             // x64/WIN64 C call arguments.
|.define CARG2,         rdx
|.define CARG3,         r8
|.define CARG4,         r9
|.else
|.define CARG1,         rdi             // x64/POSIX C call arguments.
|.define CARG2,         rsi
|.define CARG3,         rdx
|.define CARG4,         rcx
|.endif

With above in place, the code can use the mnemonics to refer to the registers rather than the registers themselves. This allows the assembly code to be coded once for both architectures.

How would one do this in D inline assembly?

Thanks and Regards
Dibyendu

Here is an example with mixins:

version (Windows)
{
    enum Reg : string
    {
        CARG1 = "RCX",
        CARG2 = "RDX",
    }
}
else
{
    enum Reg : string
    {
        CARG1 = "RDI",
        CARG2 = "RSI",
    }
}

template Instruction(string I, Reg target, Reg source)
{
enum string Instruction = "asm { mov " ~ target ~ ", " ~ source ~ "; }";
}

void func()
{
    mixin(Instruction!("mov", Reg.CARG1, Reg.CARG2));
}

Thank you - I probably could use something like this. It is uglier than the simpler approach in dynasm of course.

How about when I need to combine this with some struct/union access? In dynasm I can write:

| mov BASE, CI->u.l.base // BASE = ci->u.l.base (volatile) | mov PC, CI->u.l.savedpc // PC = CI->u.l.savedpc

How can I mix the mixin above and combine with struct offsets?

Thanks and Regards
Dibyendu

Reply via email to