On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 23:29:01 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 22:33:40 UTC, kdevel wrote:
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 14:58:03 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
In this case i'd go for a typed pointer, e.g
---
immutable struct Configuration
{
this(string){/*load some file...*/}
int value;
}
Configuration* config;
void main()
{
try config = new Configuration("config.sdl");
catch(Exception){}
// config.value = 42; // ok, read only
}
---
When config is null, e.g. in case "load some file..." threw,
you get a segfault. No error handling at all!
I don't follow you...the file thing happens in the __ctor.
Exceptions are well handled.
But not in the code you provided first. You used to ignore the
exception:
catch(Exception){}
Maybe you've missed the try (w/o braces) ?
Not really.
---
immutable struct Configuration {
this(string){/*parse_config...*/}
}
Configuration* config;
int main() {
try {
config = new Configuration("config.sdl");
// instead of "conf = parse_config("config.sdl");"
} catch(Exception e){
std.stdio.stderr.writeln("Error reading configuration
file: ", e.msg);
return 1;
}
}
---
Are my eyes too weak or is my compiler too old? For this piece of
code
test.d
```
immutable struct C {
this (string filename)
{
}
}
void main ()
{
auto config = new C ("config.sdl");
}
```
it says: test.d(9): Error: immutable method test.C.this is not
callable using a mutable object
→ https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13628
→
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mailman.926.1413747186.9932.digitalmars-d-b...@puremagic.com
