Re: Is Nullable supposed to provide Optional semantics?

[vit via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 20:52:51 UTC, Chris Paulson-Ellis 
wrote:
I've been bitten by trying to use Nullable(T) on class types. 
Minimal example...

[...]

use:
   n = Nullable!Object.init;   //doesn't call destroy

instead of:
   n.nullify();