On Sunday, 7 January 2018 at 02:17:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Sunday, 7 January 2018 at 01:08:44 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 12:55:27AM +0000, Stefan Koch via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Saturday, 6 January 2018 at 23:25:58 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
> Is 'static foreach' sufficient for all needs or is there
> any value for regular foreach over compile-time sequences?
[...]
No it's not.
When you can use the old style do so. Since it puts less
stress on the
compiler in the general case.
Really? Based on a recent post by Jonathan Davis, the new
static foreach actually runs faster in certain use cases.
T
That might be true.
If you are hitting some constant factor, however the big-o for
static foreach is worse then for tuple foreach.
FWIW there isn't any measurable performance penalty / difference.
We moved to use static foreach on Phobos recently:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5989
