On Sunday, 11 February 2018 at 17:28:25 UTC, Eld0r wrote:
changed my design from extending thread to just using
taskPool.parallel.
seems like my implementation left to many open threads in
background and forcing the operation system to cut them off.
thought start() and join() allowed me to use start() again on
the same thread object in next loop.
But there is some leakage... are they not 'self-closig' after
finnishing run() ?
works now
but you are welcome to leave a statement.
For a statement... I'm glad you found your way! However nobody
can debug a program they can't read so please always post a small
working example in order for others to understand your issue and
be able to reproduce it ;)
