On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 09:06:09 UTC, Domain wrote:
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 08:59:46 UTC, Domain wrote:
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 07:51:27 UTC, Domain wrote:
[...]

And why this not compile:

rows.each!(a => data ~= a.split(",").map!(b => b.strip).padRight("", 2));


Error: cannot deduce function from argument types !()(string[]), candidates are:
C:\D\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\algorithm\iteration.d(899): 
C:\D\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\algorithm\iteration.d(934):

OK, this compile:
rows.each!(a => data ~= a.split(",").map!(b => b.strip).padRight("", 2).array);

FYI: Idiomatic D would be to avoid allocations (faster!).
An example:

```
auto html = " a,b<br/>1, 2<br/>3<br/> ";
auto rows = html.strip.splitter("<br/>").filter!(not!empty).map!(a => a.splitter(","));
rows.writeln;
```

https://run.dlang.io/is/LC7Sog

If you really, really need a 2d array you can always do so if required at the end:

```
auto arr2d = rows.map!array.array;
```

But please keep in mind that you ideally avoid the allocations in the first place.

Reply via email to