On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 01:22:15 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I would like to know if this can be improved to support the following:* binary assignment operators (e.g. +=) * unary assignment operators (e.g. ++) * @safe, @nogc, and -betterC compatible* at least as good code generation as that proposed in the DIP when optimizations are enabled.
* And should be scalable to data that isn't addressable (e.g. bitfields). See https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187
