On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 02:06:57 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 01:39:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
private is private to the module, not the class. There is no
way in D to restrict the rest of the module from accessing the
members of a class. This simplification makes it so that stuff
like C++'s friend are unnecessary. If your class in a separate
module from main, then main won't be able to access its
private members.
- Jonathan M Davis
Mmm.. I don't think I like it.
I feel you should be able to make a member of a class, private,
regardless of where the class is located. This seems to break
the concept of class encapsulation.
No. I don't like it at all.
Relevant article:
http://www.drdobbs.com/cpp/how-non-member-functions-improve-encapsu/184401197