On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 at 09:58:11 UTC, bauss wrote:
So now "in" is basically just an alias and serves no real purpose or is there a plan to eventually make "in" mean something other than just "const"?
At this point it's the spec that serves no real purpose, sometimes in is scope, sometimes it isn't and sometimes scope is not scope either. I don't think any decision was made on this, it's just PRs getting merged as long as tests pass.
