I currently have a situation where I want to have a function that accepts a parameter optionally.
why not simply use function overloading?
On Sunday, 1 April 2018 at 15:54:16 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
- Re: Optional parameters? Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Alex via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Boris-Barboris via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Boris-Barboris via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional paramet... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional paramet... Boris-Barboris via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Seb via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Ali via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Norm via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Timoses via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Cym13 via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Timoses via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Dukc via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional parameters? Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Optional paramet... Dukc via Digitalmars-d-learn
