On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 05:29:23PM +0200, Robert M. Münch via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> I have two foreach loops where the inner should change the iterator
> (append new entries) of the outer.
>
> foreach(a, candidates) {
> foreach(b, a) {
> if(...) candidates ~= additionalCandidate;
> }
> }
>
> The foreach docs state that the collection must not change during
> iteration.
>
> So, how to best handle such a situation then? Using a plain for loop?
[...]
Yes.
T
--
The fact that anyone still uses AOL shows that even the presence of options
doesn't stop some people from picking the pessimal one. - Mike Ellis
