On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 21:54:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[H]onestly, I don't understand why folks keep trying to put nullable types in Nullable in non-generic code.
How do you signify that a struct member of class type is optional?
- Nullable!T with T of class type kdevel via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Nullable!T with T of cla... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Nullable!T with T of cla... Nathan S. via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Nullable!T with T of... kdevel via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Nullable!T with T of cla... Nathan S. via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Nullable!T with T of cla... kdevel via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Nullable!T with T of... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Nullable!T with T of... kdevel via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Nullable!T with ... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Nullable!T with ... kdevel via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Nullable!T w... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Nullable!T with ... aliak via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Nullable!T with ... Jordan Wilson via Digitalmars-d-learn
