On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 09:50:32 UTC, Jim Balter wrote:
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 08:50:15 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
struct A
{
int a;
@disable ~this() {}
}
void main()
{
A a = A(2);
}
Currently, this code yields:
Error: destructor `A.~this` cannot be used because it is
annotated with @disable
I was expecting that disabling the destructor would make it as
if the struct does not have a destructor
Why? That's not the semantics of @disable. And why would you
want that? What are you actually trying to achieve?
I just don't understand why you would ever mark the destructor of
a struct with @disable. When is that useful? If it's not, why not
just forbit it?
