On 07/26/2018 09:24 AM, jmh530 wrote:
> On Thursday, 26 July 2018 at 08:08:17 UTC, Timoses wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 21:17:38 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
>> Regarding this example
>>
>> void fun() {
>> /*const*/
>> {
>> double bar;
>> }
>>
>> static assert(!is (typeof(bar)));
>> }
>>
>> it would kind of violate that `bar` is declared within its own scoped
>> block if the static assert failed just because `const` was applied to
>> the block.
>
> I don’t think the const block introduces a new scope.
It doesn't but the scope itself is legal in a nested scope; so, 'const'
should not remove the scope either.
> It works at the
> global level just fine.
It must be because one cannot introduce a nested scope at the global scope:
// illegal
{
double bar;
}
void main() {
// legal
{
double bar;
}
}
Ali
