On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 15:18:29 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 14:48:57 UTC, Alex wrote:
Because it could be meant as the argument to some templates to
the left. Like
(foo!bar)!x
Sure, it would be a coincidence, if both will work. However,
templates are not something where you can simply imply the
associative property, I think.
Of course there isn't an associative property... But I was
thinking that without brackets the parser could fall back to
whatever default "left to right" precedence, as would happen
with operators, which needn't be associative either.
Ah... ok. Got your idea. No. This isn't possible because some
symmetry of the operator is implied.
https://wiki.dlang.org/Operator_precedence
Chaining is explicitly not allowed, like in comparison operators
:)
