On Sunday, 30 September 2018 at 10:28:25 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Sunday, 30 September 2018 at 09:30:38 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote:
Is there a way to either have a constant reference to a class that can be set to a new value, or is there a way to convert the class variable to a class pointer?

I think, what you are facing here, is the different notion of const, as used from C++. The reasoning about it is described for example here:
http://jmdavisprog.com/articles/why-const-sucks.html
Jonathan is much better therein as I am.

However, there are approaches to solve what you want to do. For example, there is a Rebindable around:
https://dlang.org/library/std/typecons/rebindable.html

´´´
import std.stdio;
import std.typecons;

void main()
{
        class Thing {int dummy; }
        class ThingSaver {
                /*
                A const(Thing) could not be changed in setThing(),
                but a Rebindable can be reassigned, keeping t const.
                */
                Rebindable!(const Thing) t;

                void setThing(in Thing thing) {
                        t = thing;  // No pointers in use :)
                }
                const(Thing) getThing() const {
                        return t;
                }
        }
        
        Thing t1 = new Thing();

        ThingSaver saver = new ThingSaver();
        saver.setThing(t1);
        //saver.t.dummy = 5; fails as expected.
        const(Thing) t2 = saver.getThing();
}
´´´
I hope, I got your idea right...

That pretty much hits the nail on the head, and you're exactly right about where my understanding was coming from (C++). In fact, I'm moving a lot of code from C++ to D and finding equivalents for a lot of high-performance index classes, which end up using this kind of pattern.

Now I need to take the time to grok this article!

Reply via email to