On Monday, 26 November 2018 at 09:04:25 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Why is there no
- __traits(isArray, T)
alongside
- __traits(isStaticArray, T) and
- __traits(isAssociativeArray, T)
when dmd already has `ENUMTY.Tarray` alongside
- ENUMTY.Tsarray and
- ENUMTY.Taarray
and std.traits already has a wrapper for this at
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_traits.html#isDynamicArray
?
Should we add this new builtin trait and use it in
std.traits.isDynamicArray?
If so, should we call it
- __traits(isDynamicArray) or
- __traits(isArray) or
- __traits(isArraySlice) or
- __traits(isSlice) or
something else?
Yeah maybe just try, although i see some alias this implication
in the current std.traits implementation. Adding a new trait is
rarely a big deal as far as i could see in the past (i.e no big
never endings discussions).
