On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 14:07 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > […] > The problem is that while there is no shortage of complaints about XML > support in D, there is a great dearth of people actually willing to *do* > something about it.
In my case it is because I have no need to deal with XML using D, and I am not in the market for paid work. Those actually doing stuff with XML and D have far fewer excuses. > At least Jonathan wrote dxml, which arguably would meet the need in most > cases. So there's that. But if somebody wants entity references and > other similar things, the only recourse would appear to be to wrap > libxml2. Given D's aptitude at interfacing with C, this should be much > simpler than writing dxml. It just needs someone to sit down and *do* > it. That people who have the problem can write many lengthy emails on the D lists rather than doing something about creating a D binding to libxml2 is clearly the bulk of the problem. -- Russel. =========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part