On Saturday, 18 May 2019 at 00:17:20 UTC, kdevel wrote:
Why not simply 17.5531 ms ("%.4f ms") to get rid of the non-ASCII µ prefix?
fwiw I like this solution for the output. It is very clear to me.
Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn Sat, 18 May 2019 06:25:43 -0700
On Saturday, 18 May 2019 at 00:17:20 UTC, kdevel wrote:
Why not simply 17.5531 ms ("%.4f ms") to get rid of the non-ASCII µ prefix?
fwiw I like this solution for the output. It is very clear to me.