Re: Performance of tables slower than built in?

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Thursday, 23 May 2019 at 21:47:45 UTC, Alex wrote:
Either way, sin it's still twice as fast. Also, in the code the 
sinTab version is missing the writeln so it would have been 
faster.. so it is not being optimized out.

Well, when I run this modified version:

https://gist.github.com/run-dlang/9f29a83b7b6754da98993063029ef93c

on https://run.dlang.io/

then I get:

LUT:    709
sin(x): 2761

So the LUT is 3-4 times faster even with your quarter-LUT 
overhead.