On 27.08.19 18:12, berni wrote:
a += 100;
results (independed of the used compiler) in
I was a little bit surprised, because a += 100 should be the same as
a = a+100, which leads to a range violation error. Furthermore, as
we work with real, I'd expected the result to be NaN...
Is this a bug? I ask, because it would be quite convenient to use it the
way it works now.
For what it's worth, it's in Bugzilla: