On 2019-09-06 21:03, Max Samukha wrote:
Is there any practical use of having identically named .d and .di alongside?
Same as in C/C++. This allows you to have a header file if you want to distribute a closed source library.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-learn Sat, 07 Sep 2019 06:05:38 -0700
On 2019-09-06 21:03, Max Samukha wrote:
Is there any practical use of having identically named .d and .di alongside?
Same as in C/C++. This allows you to have a header file if you want to distribute a closed source library.
-- /Jacob Carlborg