On Friday, 25 October 2019 at 14:51:33 UTC, Yui Hosaka wrote:
The outputs for your program are as follows: [...]
Thanks for the output. I added it to the bug report.
The internal representation of the value is correct in all
versions. While the result of the direct call of snprintf always
gives the wrong answer. Therefore I think, the bug is to be found
in this function. Resently Robert Schadek noted, that it would be
nice, to have this function be rewritten in D anyway. I'll have a
look if I can do this in the next weeks but do not want to
promise anything yet.
With "-m64" or "-m64 -O":
---
0.02
3b df 4f 8d 97 6e 12 83 f9 3f
0.00
---
The "0.00" is strange.
