On 2/2/20 1:32 PM, Dennis wrote:
On Sunday, 2 February 2020 at 18:18:28 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:scope should have been a type constructor.I feel the same way, I find const/immutable much easier to reason about than scope in its current state. Do you think scope as a storage class is fundamentally broken, or is it still sound, just not very granular?
I think it should be like const or immutable -- both storage class and type constructor.
-Steve