Re: Cannot take slice of scope static array in @safe code

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On 2/2/20 1:32 PM, Dennis wrote:
On Sunday, 2 February 2020 at 18:18:28 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
scope should have been a type constructor.

I feel the same way, I find const/immutable much easier to reason about 
than scope in its current state.
Do you think scope as a storage class is fundamentally broken, or is it 
still sound, just not very granular?

I think it should be like const or immutable -- both storage class and 
type constructor.

-Steve