On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:22:34 +0300, Walter Bright
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
Should the function signature of std.math.poly be (real x, const real[]
A),
not (real x, real[] A)? The D code at the end of the function clearly
doesn't
modify A, but I have no idea what the ASM code is doing. Is this a bug?
Yes, it should be const.
crc32 module also needs to be updated. Not only it doesn't use const (but
should, it allows compile-time crc32 evaluation), but it also uses char[]
instead of string! :)
