== Quote from Walter Bright ([email protected])'s article > bearophile wrote: > > I have already answered something in another post. But instead of > > asking us/yourself if we can use the feature X, why don't you think > > about implementing the features Y and Z that are most useful to > > programmers, like, for example, named arguments (and several other > > things discussed in the past)? I can find many uses for named > > arguments and only one or two for 128-big integral numbers... > > > > I know the story of the car/horse by Ford, but often the users know > > what they need :-) I may use several things currently absent in D2 > > while I have little use of many of the things recently added/modified > > in D2. (for example I may like the idea of vector operations, but so > > far I haven't used them yet in actual programs, while I can think of > > several other things missing still that I can find useful today, that > > are missing still in D2). > Yet in the past, many people asked for vector operations.
I absolutely *love* the vector ops, except that they're kind of buggy. The only reason I haven't filed bug reports is that the bugs are kind of hard to reproduce. Now that it's been brought to my attention and I have some free time, maybe I'll try to reproduce and file some of them.
