Weed wrote:
Frits van Bommel пишет:
Don wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Don wrote:
A straightforward first step would be to state in the spec that "the
compiler is entitled to assume that X+=Y yields the same result as
X=X+Y"
That doesn't hold for reference types, does it?
I thought it does? Got any counter examples?
For any class type, with += modifying the object and + returning a new one:
The += operator too should return the object (usually "this")
ALWAYS 'this'. It's another feature of operator overloading which is
redundant.
