John Reimer wrote:
The danger, of course, is that Tango will not be taken seriously again for D 2.0. If Tango manages to garner the lion-share of popularity as they did with D 1.0 (LDC compiler suite is one example of the significant sway Tango has had on D 1.0 ), then I think I'm going to just throw up my hands. Yes, I think something has to be done: ignoring Tango is not going to be a healthy option for D. Either that or Phobos2 will have to be so good that people will drop Tango faster than they would a red-hot frying pan.
Beware of the false choice. Ideally, Phobos2 will be so good, and Tango2 will be so good, that people will enjoy using either or both together.
Andrei
