On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Jason House <[email protected]> wrote: > I was chatting on #gdb earlier today and it sounds like getting a patch for > the d programming language into gdb shouldn't be too bad. There's a patches > mailing list and some kind of paperwork to resolve copyright issues. > > Is there any legal/copyright issues that prevent the gdb patch from making it > into gdb? Maybe demangling uses digital mars code? I'd really love to see > complete support for D in gdb. It's really frustrating to not have it :( >
I think pretty much everything DM makes is licensed under either public domain or artistic. Check out std.demangle and see what the license says.
