Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> wrote:But you lose correctness and efficiency. I agree that in certain cases they aren't paramount, but you can't build a language to not allow them.Correctness is fine, but efficiency be damned.
You and I don't seem to frequent the same circles.
Look at where _that_ mantra has gotten C++.
Not sure that efficiency is the source of most or even many of the known issues with C++.
Andrei
