== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu ([email protected])'s article > I've been thinking for a while to suggest Walter to allow overloading of > void vs. anything else return type. Making one private or undefined > would prevent statically that people call functions and ignore error codes. > Andrei
Who still uses error codes? The only time I can think of that mattering is if you're calling C functions, in which case overloading wouldn't work anyhow. Isn't enforcing that the caller not ignore an error condition what exceptions are for?
