On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Ellery Newcomer <[email protected]> wrote: > What about that !in operator? That wouldn't be difficult to include in D2, > would it?
It's been discussed to death. The problem is that 'in' currently returns a pointer, and if !in returned a bool, it would be incongruous. Personally, I don't agree, but whatever.
