Robert Fraser wrote: > Which looks even worse. IMO, this is the perfect place for goto -- small > function, used only for an exit condition. There's no "spaghetti code" > here at all. I know goto used to be abused back in the day, but it has > its place.
Oh, I agree. I didn't say that in my response because he specifically asked for other ways to write it. In this case, I see no reason to change it. That said, it can be nearly as clean without the goto for those that are religious about it. Later, Brad
