== Quote from Bill Baxter ([email protected])'s article > On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:54 AM, grauzone <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hmmmmm. Name for a common namespace...... How about.... "common". > > > > Every time you introduce a new standard namespace, a bunch of innocent > > existing D programs might become invalid. > > > I do in fact have a top level package called "common" where I put a > bunch of code that is common to my various projects. But I would > happily rename it in a heartbeat if it meant greater unification > between Phobos and Tango. 'Tis a small price to pay.
druntime already has "core", is there truly a need for a second top-level namespace?
