Bill Baxter: > (a !in b) should exist and it should be the same as !(a in b).
Of course. Bye, bearophile
- If !in is inconsistent because of bool/pointer, then so is ... downs
- Re: If !in is inconsistent because of bool/pointer, th... bearophile
- Re: If !in is inconsistent because of bool/pointer, th... grauzone
- Re: If !in is inconsistent because of bool/pointer, th... Moritz Warning
- Re: If !in is inconsistent because of bool/pointer, th... Rainer Deyke
- Re: If !in is inconsistent because of bool/pointer... downs
- Re: If !in is inconsistent because of bool/poi... Rainer Deyke
- Re: If !in is inconsistent because of bool... bearophile
- Re: If !in is inconsistent because of... Bill Baxter
- Re: If !in is inconsistent because of... bearophile
- Re: If !in is inconsistent because of... Rainer Deyke
- Re: If !in is inconsistent becaus... Daniel Keep
- Re: If !in is inconsistent because of... downs
- Re: If !in is inconsistent because of bool... Simen Kjaeraas
