naryl wrote:
Denis Koroskin Wrote:And here are results (best/average of 3 runs):DMD2.023 - 12.492/12.576 ms (-O -inline) DMC8.42n - 13.941/14.131 ms (-O -inline)The only explanation I see is gcc does some optimization that dmd backend doesn't.
That's a good explanation. The only positive thing about the dmd backend (or dmd in general) is its compile speed.
