Kagamin пишет: > Weed Wrote: > >>> Well, D class code here is not equivalent to C++ class code. D code has >>> more features, namely, it's polymorphic: C.opAdd is able to work with >>> classes, derived from C, while corresponding C++ code is unable to do so. >> It is really true? > > Of course. >
But I do not understand in what here problem. In C++ is impossible to do overloading with "virtual" keyword? Probably I badly know C ++, sorry.
