"Don" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... >I think I have a solution to the versioning problems. > My belief is that version statements are fine, and Walter's 'rats nest' > argument is valid. Instead, I believe that version declarations limited to > "version = XXX;" are too weak. They also have syntax which is subtly > different to the rest of the language. > (version = A; version = B; looks as though you're changing the value of > the 'version' variable). > My proposal is therefore: > {snip: great proposal}
We can quibble over details of this, but I'm absolutely in full support of this general approach.
