"Yigal Chripun" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > I'm no Mac user but it seems to me that OS X is a superset of darwin (i.e > darwin plus apple's proprietery APIs like cocoa, carbon). > if that's true isn't it more acurate to have version darwin for the darwin > OS (someone mentioned opendarwin), and osx version for Apple's Mac OS X in > addition to darwin version? i.e Mac OS X is both "osx" and "darwin" > whereas opendarwin is only "darwin". > does that make sense? >
*Seems* to make sense to me, but then again, I'm not a mac user either.
