Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
On the other hand, the new form This[] works fine, so far. The only
missing feature is an opApply().
Ok, I filed a bug report on your behalf.
Thanks... I somehow always forget we have that available.
The form This[This]... Using 'foo.get!(table_t)[k] = v;' results in a
range violation. For the moment, they are essentially immutable
hashes. Could actually be fine for a number of purposes.
That's because foo.get returns by value. Try using peek, which returns a
pointer. Could you please post some code if that doesn't work for your
case?
Will try that tomorrow after work.
----------
If I get some extra free time this weekend (assuming V-day isn't the
death of me) I'll hack away at it some and see if I can't figure some
things out, on all counts above.
Oh, and THANKS. :)
Advantage #1 of marrying a foreigner: you get to convince her that V-day
is an artificial event created for commercial interests only because
they want to sell blood diamonds. Watching "Blood Diamond" together a
week before V-day recommended.
Andrei
Thanks for the advice, I'll try it next year. ;)
-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls
