bearophile wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley:

This is an old discussion, and maybe it will not lead to much.


If you don't have a semicolon, you get a simple parser error. That is not a 
bug.<

Wikipedia agrees with me:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_bug
A software bug is an error, flaw, mistake, failure, or fault in a computer program 
that prevents it from behaving as intended (e.g., producing an incorrect or 
unexpected result).<

So a parser error is a bug too, despite the compiler will help you find it in a 
moment.

I have written and debugged many times "mistakes" like:

foreach (a, b, iterable)
foreach (a; b; iterable)
foreach (a; b, iterable)

And probably I am not the only one :-)

Why would you do that?

Many times when writing C# loops I do foreach(x; ...) and then remember it's "in" in C#, because I'm used to writing ";" in Java. I prefer ";" because it's shorter and you write a lot of foreach loops in a program.

Maybe we should vote and see how many people make the mistake of confusing comma and semicolon in this case.



If you can't tell ; and , apart, get a better font.<

I have already modified a good font to tell apart . and ; better when I program 
D:

http://www.fantascienza.net/leonardo/ar/inconsolatag/inconsolata-g_font.zip

But having a language that is more bug-prone isn't good.


That has little to nothing to do with it.  'in' in a foreach loop header is 
unambiguous to parse.<

You may have missed the discussion last time, when I think Walter has explained 
what I have told you the problem about the compilation stages.


and changing it to 'in' does not really benefit anyone except you, since you're so 
goddamned attached to Python's syntax.<

Thank you, I attach myself to things I think are good and well designed.
And Python isn't the only language that uses "in" with a "for-each" :-)


Use Delight, ffs.<

I don't know what "ffs" means, and I'm on Windows again now :-)


Also, "I think I don't like X" is not proper English.  Say "I don't think I like X" or just 
"I don't like X" instead.<

To Jarrett: why isn't it proper English? It makes sense to me.

Reply via email to