Kagamin wrote:
Daniel Keep Wrote:

You probably don't want D, you want ATS:
http://www.ats-lang.org/

Bye,
bearophile
http://www.ats-lang.org/EXAMPLE/MISC/listquicksort.dats

Dear god.  I think... I think I'm going to go cry in the corner...

Is it common for functional languages to love 1-letter identifiers, I wonder?

Probably. Mathematicians use "ab" to mean "a multiplied by b", so they tend toward single-character identifiers with subscripts. And functional languages seem to cater more toward mathematicians.

I tend to find most examples of the remarkable efficiency of functional languages entirely unreadable, partly because of this, and partly because they seem fond of using many operators, some in ways that I find bizarre.

Reply via email to