Alex Burton escribió:
Alex Burton Wrote:
Oops I'm wrong the 2/3 is NON nullable. My brain seems to have trouble reading
all this 'non null' stuff.
Actually non nullable is a double negative.
What we really want in the D language and the language of the discussions about
D is simple.
1) Types.
2) Nullable Types - optional
There is no need for Non Nullable types. These are Types.
I think nullable types can't be optional. How do you implement a linked
list without them? You use a dummy value for the "no next node"? Naaah...
Alex
