On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 20:12:20 +1300, Daniel Keep
<[email protected]> wrote:
One issue with this is that template functions can't be virtual.
You can work around it, but it's really putting barriers up to easy use
of the new const system, which I think is a bad thing.
-- Daniel
I'd rather have virtual template functions, even if it means I have to
re-compile all subclasses when the vtbls get modified. Is there any
technicality causing it to be impossible to implement or just something
rather tricky?
