Robert Fraser Wrote: > I agree with the proposal, but for the optimization use case, use: > SYSTEMTIME st = void; > This won't initialize st to zero.
This is what I currently do but I would assume it's better suited for variables used in the current scope instead of passed as an out parameter to the next statement. So it would end up being just like doing "uint i = 0;", it works, but doing "uint i;" does the same.
