在 Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:04:09 +0800,Christian Kamm <[email protected]> 写道:

davidl Wrote:
Yeah, all the merits of ctor just outweigh its demerits. The only demerit
of it is taking "ctor" to join the keyword list, However it also bans
people from using ctor as a var( it might be positive! )

If you make ctor a keyword that doesn't behave like an identifier almost everywhere, I fear you'll just replace 'this' by 'ctor' without much benefit. I can't see a good reason for the constructor function name to be a keyword. Maybe something like opCtor or opConstruct would fit better with the existing special functions though.


Oh, right, you are pushing it further bit than I ;) I totally agree with you.

Reply via email to