Max Samukha schrieb:
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 23:22:40 +0200, Trass3r <mrmoc...@gmx.de> wrote:
OMG, I knew the recursion base case was missing, but I couldn't imagine
how to represent "nothing". Of course, an empty tuple.
But the reason I posted is cause that bug(?) is still present.
dmd doesn't crash anymore, but using const still doesn't work.
I think it's not a bug because "const" storage class doesn't always
mean "compile time". It's rather a variable (we should find a better
name) which is initialized once and cannot be changed later. To ensure
compiletimeness, you can declare the variable as "static const",
"static invariant" or "enum"
Man, static is one of the things that are totally confusing. It has
various meanings depending on where you use it and moreover it's hard to
find documentation about the one you need cause it's spread all over the
docs.
But what you are talking about is in fact what "final" does (once
initialized it can't be changed).
